Paolo Genovese, Filippo Bologna, Paolo Costella, Paola Mammini, Rolando Ravello On Rotten Tomatoes, it has an approval rating of 77% based on reviews from 13 critics. The film was number-one on its opening week in Italy, with US$3.7 million. Each of their relationships is exactly as it was at the start of the evening.
Īs the guests leave the apartment, they behave as if nothing untoward has taken place. By the end of the night, the group's friendships, marriages, and romances have been shattered. As the calls continue, the network of lies and secrets becomes increasingly tangled. They reveal that one married woman is having an affair and that a man who has been pretending to have an absent girlfriend is not who he seems.
Gradually, the calls and messages become more compromising. They will each place their phone on the table and they will share their messages and calls with the rest of the group.Īt first, the game seems harmless no one has anything to hide. As the friends debate this contention, they agree-some of them reluctantly-to play a game. Early in the meal, one of the friends, a relationship therapist named Eva, says that she is convinced that many couples would separate if they saw the messages on each other's phones. It turns out to be perfectly forgettable.On the evening of a total eclipse of the moon, seven close friends gather for a dinner party. The movie entertains, but it is better to see without thinking about it. Giovanni Ribisi is simply stupid and Nicki Aycox had a character with no credibility whatsoever. The two actors built good chemistry, but that's it.
#PERFECT STRANGER MOVIE HOT FULL#
Bruce Willis, despite being in a character that allows him to take full advantage of the charm and magnetism that usually attributed to him, also did not seem at his best.
Hale Berry tried to show talent and still achieves a satisfactory performance, but did not receive material to shine. But the bad construction of the characters is a consequence of the bad script. Another problem I noticed is the poor build of the characters, who are unable to empathize with the audience, even though I liked the idea that they all had their own "dark side", their skeleton in the closet. Honestly, the problem with this film is the poor construction of the script, which gives ancillary value and forgets the fundamental. Okay, sex sells, but even sex must have been right in a movie. Another thing that does not have any kind of relevance but that the film highlights as far as can be the torrid sexual encounters of the main character. All this ends up making us forget the initial homicide, which should be the focus of the film and which loses its importance as the games of seduction between the boss and the false employee become more intense. but if sexual harassment is a crime what we see in the film no: I only saw the female employees almost throw themselves into the employer's lap, which did not is made of iron.
The CEO of the film is portrayed as an adulterer who sexually assaults the female employees. And as if that were not enough, the journalist then decides to seduce a married man, who she knows to be a womanizer and a contumacious adulterer, to know if he killed her friend. The personal life of each one only concerns each one, and it is only each one who should see the possible contradictions that may exist and be honest with himself. At least that's what I understood! I understand that being gay and being gay is a gigantic contradiction, but it still does not seem to me a reason for a journalistic bore, even when holding public office. Right from the beginning, the journalist tries to expose a politician who, despite being a homosexual, positions himself as an opponent of LGBT rights. The problem comes when we think of what we are seeing. The film has a good initial premise and provides the public with good entertainment and even some pleasant suspense. Of course, the journalist immediately suspects him and decides to infiltrate the company and seduce him to discover the truth. The story revolves around a journalist trying to find out the killer of a childhood friend who had told her she was having an affair with a powerful executive at an advertising firm. Seriously, it's nice when we see it, but it gets worse when we think about it seriously. The story revolves around a journalist trying to find out the killer of a childhood friend who had told her she was having an affair with This movie initially did not seem to me as bad as many say it is. This movie initially did not seem to me as bad as many say it is.
0 kommentar(er)
